Racial tension and its contributions to Seminole-U.S. conflict

There are many racial tensions that contributed to the conflicts between Seminoles and U.S. Seminoles were a band of Native Americans that had some African slave influence there fore slavery and the understanding that slaves can’t own land or property caused this inferior view that the Americans had against African slaves that leads to a racial tension that we still see for a long time and still see sometimes today. The Native Americans and Americans were a similar situation in that Native Americans were seen as savages. Americans and Indians had complications over values, beliefs, and of course land these all are leading factors of tension between races. They try to introduce the natives to this better way of life, the European way, and in return want their removal from the land they could populate. They look down on their beliefs by offering up their own they teach them about property and ownership and this causes natives who still know the old ways to want to revolt against this change and loss of their freedom and civilization that they knew. All these factors are related to races because all three races have their own values and culture that they follow that don’t coincide in a way that benefits both sides.

Seminole US Conflict Race relations

Racial tension contributed to Seminole-US conflict relations in a significant way. All three cultures, the white Americans, black Americans, and Native Americans have different cultural norms. One of the problems in the relations between white Americans and Native Americans is property. White Americans would try to take Native American property. Whites would also try to coerce Native Americans to concede their land. The Native Americans also had a tense relation with the black Americans. For example Native Americans would own slaves. All in and all Native Americans pretty much got the short end of the stick. They were the ones who lost lands to the white Americans were close to wiped out by presidents like Andrew Jackson.

Is there a shared culture between Native Americans, Europeans, and Africans in Florida?

Is there a shared culture between Native Americans, Europeans, and Africans in Florida? I believe if they shared any culture at all, it was strictly through the reason they lived there; and that was either through farming, ranching, or trade. The standard of living varied extremely separating the rich from the poor on a very wide scale. There is a culture of "Floridian Living" but a culture that resembles the three together; I believe there isn't. Some parallels can be made, but in respect to how Europeans lived and how Native Americans lived is in most ways completely opposite. As time progressed and proximity of living spaces lessened, sharing of technologies did occur, but Native American assimilation was seen as inevitable. As for africans, free or not, life was tough. If free, the promise of owning land and having a family presented a stress free life. If not free, the constant threat of losing a family member to slave trade and back breaking work posed health issues. If I were placed in this time period, I have absolutely no idea how I could handle the fact that someone owns another person. This idea of stripping the identity and personal freedom of another just doesnt sit well with me.

Is there a shared culture between Native Americans, Europeans, and Africans in Florida?

Although Africans, Europeans, and Native Americans all had their own separate and equally distinct cultures in Florida during the frontier period, they also had minutely shared cultural aspects which most often arose due to the blending of the races. Africans and Natives shared the most culture throughout the period. Although some Natives owned slaves, they generally accepted blacks into their society, even allowing them to achieve and maintain upper positions in the community. Blacks and Natives intermarried and blacks adapted to Native culture, including their languages and other societal practices. Natives and Europeans also sexually integrated at times creating a race of Mestizos that embodied both Euro and Native cultures. This group of mixed-race individuals often sought European goals and goods such as the accumulation of material wealth and land but maintained much of the cultural heritage of their Indian ancestors.

Is There a Shared Culture Between Native Americans, Europeans, and Africans in Florida?

I don’t see a shared culture between the three. There are similarities between them such as a belief in a higher being: for the Indians the taker and giver of breath, for Europeans there is one God, and some African tribes belief in entities in all living creatures. There is also the idea of oppression, like what drove original settlers to America and then in turn oppression of Africans as slaves and fighting over land with Native Americans. You can take all these into account but culture to me is a basis of societal practices, beliefs, and customs in relations to life which all these three have differences such as the way of life of Native Americans is this shared land and communal life where as we discussed the clans decide the fate of the member who has done wrong which is unlike in European society where everything is based off of what you own and the ability to own property and connections to other people. Africans seem to just keep to their tight nit family units. With all these similarities and differences I can see a likeness to each other in aspects but not a full culture. The fact that later the ideas of the Europeans begin to spread through the Native Americans and Africans shows a more blended and similar culture where practices of owning land, cattle, and beliefs transition does make a new blended culture but to begin with they are very different.

Is there a shared culture between Native Americans, Europeans and Africans in Florida

There is indeed a shared culture between Native American’s, Europeans, Africans in Florida. There are many examples of this. For one they all grew up in relative close proximity so they had many interactions. They also practiced similar traditions. Religion was important in all of their cultures although separate. The Native Americans did not practice Christianity. The Europeans were Christians. Africans often times had practiced similar forms of Christianity to the Europeans but it was a broken off sect of a similar group. All of the groups owned slaves in Florida including some free blacks. There was much trade and commerce between all three groups. It is true that at times there were conflicts between these groups especially between Native Americans and Europeans and slave owners and the slaves. Native Americans taught the Europeans information about the environment and Europeans provided Native Americans with tools that improved the Native Americans’ livelihood.

British vs. Spanish Perspective

Differences between British and Spanish perspectives in frontier Florida, such as those towards Religion, African Americans, and work ethic, had expansive affects on the then-current populations. The Spanish’s strong inclination to Catholicism and its importance led to a better treatment of blacks. The harboring of fugitive slaves who converted to the religion saved countless African lives. The Spanish had an overall more relaxed view towards slavery, which allowed for better living conditions and gave slaves incentive to work hard in hopes of malumission. The British’s more rigid approach created deplorable conditions for slaves, and offered little if any opportunity for free blacks. The British had a driven mindset that often utilized huge levels of cash flow, killed off slaves or workers, and eventually turned large profits. The Spanish’s more thoughtful approach allowed for longevity of their plantations and families and supported better living conditions for all those involved.

Florida, a Multicultural Frontier

From the day the Spaniards arrived in Florida to today, this land has always been multicultural. From the first Spanish period to the British period to the second Spanish period, there was a constant flow of peoples of different nationalities coming in and out of the state. Native Americans, white European indentured workers, enslaved Africans fresh from the other side of the world or the Carolinas, and land owning British and Spanish whites all interacted in Florida. Separate cultures clashed, melded, and soon created a multicultural frontier. This tradition persists today as this state attracts individuals and family units from the world over

Differences between the British perspective and Spanish perspective...

Differences between the British perspective and Spanish perspective affect Florida life by making distinct classes or a more melting pot community. Spanish frontier Florida shaped a multicultural Florida since slaves were allowed to come to Spanish territory and prove they believe in the Catholic Faith and God through converting. Once they converted they were allowed to be free, own property and live like the Spanish settlers for the most part. Unlike in British frontier Florida where there wasn’t a way out of the slave system therefore leaving slaves to live in their own communities drawing up this difference in race and society. Life in the British Florida was a life that only benefited the white way of life with African slaves doing the grunt work to better the lives of their masters. This view in the British life caused a more worrisome lifestyle where they held a fear of losing control of these slaves that do everything for them. Spanish life brings a communal society that slaves would never be able to obtain otherwise in the new land. This community that was built allows a calmer perspective with less fear of conflict within their communities to be built up. Spanish continually had a higher tolerance and ability to work more peacefully to build their communities and made connections with the slaves and even Indians rather than conflict.